Metastatic clear cell endometrial carcinoma: an unusual cause of a common clinical presentation

Background

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy with estimated 61 880 new cases and 12 160 deaths in the USA for 2019.1 There are various histological subtypes of EC including endometrioid, papillary serous carcinoma (PSC), mucinous, clear cell (CC) and squamous cell categories.2 The endometrioid subtype accounts for 80% of cases and is referred to as type 1 EC.3 4 The recognised environmental risk factors for endometrioid EC include obesity, nulliparity and diabetes mellitus.5 The non-endometrioid subtypes (collectively referred to as type 2), although less common, run a more aggressive clinical course and patients have worse outcomes compared with the endometrioid subtype.3 Although PSC and CC are only 10% and 3%, respectively, of all ECs, they account for 39% and 8%, respectively, of the total EC mortality (figure 1).6

CC endometrial carcinoma is a rare subtype of EC which does not seem to be caused by the hyperestrogenemic states that predispose to endometrioid EC.2 6 It accounts for 3% of all ECs.6

In addition to having a rare subtype of endometrial carcinoma, our patient had an unusual pattern of metastasis which prompted this case report. We report a case of metastatic CC endometrial carcinoma cancer with a rare metastasis site manifesting as acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old woman with a history of CC endometrial carcinoma who had undergone total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) 10 months prior presented with abdominal pain, melena and generalised weakness for 2 weeks. She did not receive adjuvant therapy following her TAH and BSO because she was lost to follow-up.

She had no family history of cancer, smoked marijuana but not tobacco and did not drink any alcohol. On examination, she was tachycardic with a regular heart rate of 124 beats/min and normotensive with a blood pressure of 117/82 mmHg. She had conjunctival pallor on general examination while her abdominal examination revealed a soft, non-tender abdomen with no palpable mass. Digital rectal examination revealed melena.

Investigations

The haemoglobin level was 56g/L with mean corpuscular volume of 78.7 fL, blood urea nitrogen of 24 mg/dL and creatinine of 0.9 mg/dL. A rapid cross match of blood was done in preparation for transfusion because she was anaemic and tachycardic. Given her history of EC, a contrast-enhanced CT scan of her abdomen revealed a heterogeneously enhancing 8×6×9 cm mass arising from the duodenum, abutting the abdominal aorta but not eroding into the aorta (figure 2). For better evaluation of the gastrointestinal bleed a CT scan of the abdomen using the gastrointestinal bleed protocol was also obtained which showed evidence of active extravasation of contrast material in the duodenum. Invasive angiography of the abdomen was subsequently performed to confirm the finding on CT angiogram and potentially to perform embolisation of the culprit vessel if it was found. There was however no active extravasation on invasive angiography, so no embolisation was performed.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was then performed to attempt to localise the source of the bleed and for potential therapeutic intervention. The EGD was however abandoned because the endoscope could not be advanced beyond the first part of the duodenum due to an extrinsic compression from the mass that was earlier noted on the CT scan.

Treatment

Transfusion of packed red blood cells was administered with appropriate rise in haemoglobin level. However, she had further episodes of melena with associated hypotension, so a massive blood transfusion protocol was activated, and she was admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU). Having failed to treat the persistent gastrointestinal bleed using endoscopic and interventional radiology means, she had emergent laparotomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy with excision of the duodenal mass. Intraoperatively, the mass was found to have invaded the duodenum with an overlying necrotic duodenal ulcer; however, there was no aortoenteric communication. The mass could not be excised intact, so it was dissected piece meal, but all the grossly visible tumour could not be excised. Postoperatively, she was transferred to the surgical ICU. She recovered well post operatively and was transferred out of the ICU 7 days postoperatively.

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry of the duodenal mass confirmed a similar histology with the primary EC that was found in the hysterectomy specimen 10 months prior to presentation.

Outcome and follow-up

Her postoperative course was complicated by wound dehiscence which necessitated abdominal closure 5 days postoperatively. After she was transferred out of the ICU, she also developed hyperactive delirium which further prolonged her hospital stay. She had repeat abdominal CT scan which showed no intraabdominal infection; blood and urine cultures also showed no infection. She was managed with supportive care and antipsychotic medication (quetiapine) in conjunction with consultant psychiatrist. On the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale, she had a score of 3; indicating a poor functional status. The medical oncologist, clinical oncologist and the palliative care physician discussed the options for adjuvant therapy with the patient and her family but the patient was not a candidate for any adjuvant therapy given her performance status of 3. After understanding the aggressive nature of the disease and the poor prognosis, the patient and her family opted for supportive care and she was discharged to inpatient hospice 40 days postoperatively. She subsequently died 90 days postoperatively.